Yesterday, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released its final rule governing the creation and operation of health care exchanges, a key component of the President’s health care law. As Americans for Prosperity has written on multiple occasions, we do not support the efforts by states to serve as the administrative arm of the federal government by creating an exchange.
Upon releasing the 644 page regulation, with hundreds of pages more to come, Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said “these policies give states the flexibility they need to design an Exchange that works for them.” But after reading the regulation, Americans for Prosperity asks “Flexibility? What Flexibility?”
Any state hoping to create an exchange must first apply to HHS using their “exchange blueprint” template. Secretary Sebelius has sole authority to approve or deny the application. Additionally, any “significant change” must also be approved by the Secretary.
The rule uses the word “must” over 1,000 times and the word “require” more than 320 times. It also tells states what insurance plans will look like and what benefits they must cover; removing power from states. HHS’s rule gets so specific as to dictate what items a state must include on its exchange website and how its call center must operate. How much flexibility does a state truly have when all decisions must be approved by Washington?
Additionally, the rule itself says that the “minimum functions…are a floor not a ceiling.” States only have the option to further concentrate control in the hands of bureaucrats, not keep it where it should be, between patients and doctors. Even worse, HHS requires that states hire “navigators” with their own funds to shamelessly promote the so-called benefits of exchanges to individuals. ObamaCare’s primary architect, economist Jonathan Gruber, confirms that premiums will go up for individuals in the exchanges.
If even after all of this a state wanted to comply with the federal government’s request to create an exchange, time is running out. Exchanges must be certified by Secretary Sebelius in a little more than nine months, on January 1, 2013, creating a logistical nightmare. States must comply with all of HHS’s regulations while building a web portal that allows individuals to shop and apply; interfaces with various government agencies like the Internal Revenue Service, Medicaid and the Social Security Administration; and allows insurers to market their products. This is a formidable task that even the federal government isn’t sure it can accomplish.
Given the thousands of pages of regulation and lack of state flexibility, AFP continues to urge states not to implement Obama’s health care exchanges.
Check out previous posts in the “Welcome to ObamaCare” series by clicking below:
- Part I – Overselling on Child Coverage and Preexisting Conditions
- Part II – Obama Taxing Benefits Costs Companies Millions
- Part III – CMS Finally Admits ObamaCare “Cost Savings” Are Phony
- Part IV – Can You Really “Keep Your Plan” If You Like It?
- Part V – Businesses Feeling the Impact, Asking for Waivers
- Part VI – Proposed Regulations “Exchange” a Good Idea for a Bad One
- Part VII – Acting up in CLASS
- Part VIII – Don’t Let a Simple Thing Like Funding Stop You
congress needs to stand up for the american people, and throw Obama care in the trash can
lets go back to the way it was before obama be came president of our great nation we have lost out values how can we stand up and say american the land of the free when we are in Bondage.
another reason to live broke if you know you will deelvop a seroius condition down the road. Look at Steve Jobs, he deelvoped pancreatic cancer and seemed to be healthy right? The new normal would be don’t have much in the way of assets that anyone can take. It’s become a sick fucking game ever since government got involved in the system and the prices are now out of scope with the public market and insurance is soooo watered down. I’ll let my body self correct and die accordingly.
STEPH: Your rebuttal would rrueiqe me to agree with the judge who says 2+2=4 & the judge who says 2+2=5. Would you agree with the Kelo decision that said the govt can take property for public purpose instead oif public use as the Const says? You’re right though, the SCOTUS has ruled that you have no intellectual property rights under SS, so if the govt says the $ is gone & we can’t pay for it, you’ll be up a creek without a paddle. Where in the Const is SS sanctioned? Try again
Pingback: It’s time for the Missouri House to Block Exchanges | Health Care Freedom
a LIE: it is constitutional. It has been meavissly repeated by many justice courts and of course the Supreme on. Maybe you are not familiar with the 16th Amendment (among many others law texts) or you are the kind of Americans who only defend the amendments which suits them? Biased In politics, some American people are becoming more&more crazy ideological guy, totally fundamentalists and forget that many things were and should be based on pragmatism.